City, not homeowners, should bear sidewalk costs

As the sidewalks emerge from the snow, they also are emerging as a hot topic at city hall. Mark McNeese, ITD's pedestrian/bicycle coordinator, recently made a case for sidewalks. He spoke of their function in creating community, ensuring safer routes for school children, and enhancing a city's walkability, especially among the elderly and disabled. In short, he spoke of sidewalks as a public good.

Sandpoint's pedestrian advisory committee views sidewalks in much the same light. Safety, especially for school children, is a guiding concern. PAC acts in an advisory capacity only; it is ultimately up to the council to make decisions regarding sidewalks.

If sidewalks are seen to contribute to the community's safety and general well-being, why are individual property owners expected to bear the financial responsibility for installation and maintenance? Was it tongue-and-cheek irony that the Sandpoint Public Works Department put out a brochure entitled, “Sidewalk Owners Manual?”

I believe that sidewalks, like streets, are part of the city's infrastructure and, as such, should be installed and maintained entirely at public expense. It seems a gross unfairness that property owners should be forced to bear any cost for sidewalks above those included in their property taxes.

I hope the city, ever mindful it is spending the public dollar, will apportion prudently among the many often-competing wants and needs of the city. I hope, too, that citizen input will guide the council in making important decisions about Sandpoint's future.

GRETCHEN WARD

Sandpoint