Civility appreciated even when views are different

David Gunter's letter of Jan. 8 hits the nail on the head. He supports the school levy, a position I agree with, but more important, he values the opinions of others in the community.

Too often letters published here reflect writers' opinions that they are the good guys and people with other opinions are wrong or bad or stupid or all three. Gunter's letter refers to opponents of the levy as "good people" and "well-meaning citizens," and indeed they are. He voices a confidence that all members of the community are trying their utmost to do what's best for all.

The polarized politics of "I'm right and you're wrong," "I'm good and you're bad," and "I  know what's going on and you're ignorant" ignore the reality that intelligent, responsible, compassionate citizens can have different views on an issue. Denial of this reality has wrought havoc on our national politics and our international relations. Respect for the differing opinions of our opponents enables us to have a constructive dialogue, understand what each of us has to offer, and build on what we have in common.

Gunter's letter is exemplary in its language of inclusion and appreciation. We might hope that other writers will express their opinions in such thoughtful terms.

CATE HUISMAN

Sandpoint