Everyone must be held accountable in case

How is it that two of the subjects involved in last fall’s vandalism were named while the third remains unnamed? On reading the police reports, they indicate that this third subject was involved in the major part of the damage done at the Healing Garden and other locations throughout the city.

While I have no problem with individuals being named, I do think that all involved should have been. Could it be because this third suspect has several sponsorships that would be jeopardized if he was named in a crime? Could that be the reason that no charges were brought against him?

DAVID R. HANCOCK

Sandpoint