History is on the side against global warming

Update on “Climategate:” Russia recently revealed that climate scientists took data from Russian climate stations that supported their agenda and ignored the other stations. This cherry-picking of data has been going on for decades.

The media ignore massive evidence against global warming, including thousands of credible scientists who say our climate has natural warming and cooling cycles, probably resulting from changes in sunspots, and history proves it.

History is a major inconvenience for global warming “scientists” who want to discredit, for example, the Medieval Warm Period, a warming cycle when humans could not have been the cause. Note that when natural climate cycle deniers say ice is melting, polar bears are dying, etc., they are getting their information from these “scientists.” For the record, the 2008-2009 Antarctic ice melt was the lowest in 30 years.  

Why do the “scientists” lie?  For money (from grants and promotions) and for the status of being on the politically correct side of the debate.

Why do officials award grants, promotions and status to these “scientists?” Because the imagined global warming catastrophe is a reason to take power—the power to “redistribute” money, yours and mine, to themselves and their friends, and the power to control every aspect of our lives—where our money goes, what kinds of cars, houses and lightbulbs we are permitted to buy, the temperature in our homes, legal control of every drop of water on (what used to be) private property (Senate bill 787), and more.

The EPA uses the words “command and control” to indicate their plans for regulating carbon dioxide (CO2). Get the picture? Note that plants need CO2, and less of it means lower crop yields and potential famine.

It’s all about the corruption of power and money versus the simple truth. In the 1970s they were warning us about the coming ice age. Now it’s global warming. Population control is the newest thing. Does that mean a one-child policy? Forced abortion or sterilization? A resurgence of eugenics? They want to control everyone but themselves, as shown by the energy-guzzling mansions, vehicles, planes and yachts owned by prominent environmentalists and the private jets flown to Copenhagen.

What will they do next for power and money? It would be a joke if it weren’t so frightening. God help us.

JOANNA FUCHS

Cocolalla