Climate change consensus claim is liberal myth
In his letter of Sept. 19, Jack DeBaun once again promotes his concept of science. To him, science is “provisional” (that is, “conditional”) based upon the “possibility” of new evidence proving the scientific conclusions wrong. These can change at any time, of course, which makes his version of science very fluid and uncertain. So, in his version of science, maybe the earth doesn’t revolve around the sun after all, nor does it rotate in orbit giving us night and day. It’s all “provisional.”
This is what is known as junk science. It isn’t real and it doesn’t make sense. Instead, it is preposterous.
But real science gives us real facts. Example: Put your hand in front of your face. Is it your hand? Can you see it? Then it is a scientific fact that your hand is in front of your face. Period. That is common sense reason, something which leftists do not understand. Real science can be proven. Junk science cannot, because it’s “provisional.”
Jack also defines climate crisis as something which is defined as something that negatively impacts some of the population. Guess what, then? Rising costs of groceries and gasoline, housing, etc. have negatively impacted most Americans due to the policies of today’s Democrats. This is, then, a crisis — one created by the liberal left of America.
And again, there is no 97% scientific consensus on climate change. That is an unprovable myth created by the liberal left to persuade people into accepting socialism into their lives.
MONTE HEIL
Sagle