An answer to a question on DEI

Recently a letter on the Opinion page asked, “If you are not for DEI, what are you for.” Excellent question.

I am for our national motto, “E Pluribus Unum” (out of many, one). It recognizes and honors the fact we have different backgrounds but challenges us to seek what we have in common. Diversity is a condition, not a goal. 

I am for equality. We are all equal and should treat each other as such. Wealth, talent, or circumstance do not define our worth. That realization humbles those with many blessings and uplifts those whose conditions are less fortunate. We share inalienable rights. When a government, corporation, or institution seeks equity over equality, it imposes value judgements that stereotype entire classes of people. That practice has the dangerous consequence of removing our personal responsibility to revere every person as an individual.

I am for inclusion. The psychological definition of inclusion refers to creating environments where all individuals regardless of background or differences feel valued, respected and have equal access to opportunities and resources. When we focus on what we have in common and acknowledge that, despite our differences, we are all equal; it requires us to be inclusive.

Unfortunately, I witness many disciples of the political movement labeled as “DEI” as being insincere when it comes to inclusion. Too often I hear these disciples demean conservative elected officials who happened to be Black, dismiss women who believe life begins at conception, and disrespect those who, heaven forbid, voted for Trump. 

STEVE BLASKA

Sagle