When fighting DEI becomes DEI

Let’s talk about the irony no one’s calling out.

The loudest voices condemning diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) are now turning around and demanding the federal government yank funding from universities that “allow antisemitism.” And here’s the kicker — they’re doing it by arguing that Jewish students deserve protection and inclusion on campus.

That’s literally the definition of DEI.

DEI isn’t just about race or gender. It’s about making sure every student — regardless of background, religion, or identity — feels safe, respected, and supported. If a university is failing Jewish students, that should be addressed. But using that as a political weapon while simultaneously trying to dismantle broader inclusion efforts is hypocritical.

Let’s be real. These aren’t anti-DEI moves — they’re just selective DEI. The goal isn’t to get rid of inclusion; it’s to control who gets included. They’re not against inclusion — they’re just mad when it’s not on their terms.

This isn’t the death of DEI. It’s proof that even the people shouting against it still want a version of it — they just want to control the narrative. 

My father grew up in Nazi-occupied Norway. He survived, but he never forgot. He warned us to watch carefully: “Watch who they blame first. Then next … and next again. That’s where it begins.” He saw it happen before. He knew the signs. And today, I hear his voice in everything we’re seeing now.

KARI SACCOMANNO

Sandpoint