<p>Chantelle and Mike Sackett talk about their case after their property rights case was heard by the Supreme Court last fall. (Photo courtesy PACIFIC LEGAL FOUNDATION)</p>
March 22, 2012
Stories this photo appears in:
Supreme Court mulls federal water rules in Priest Lake case
Case could provide opportunity for court to rein in what types of waters are subject to a provision of Clean Water Act known as ‘Waters of the United States’
The U.S. Supreme Court opened its term Monday with an Idaho case that could significantly restrict the federal government’s power to enforce clean water laws and prove crucial in determining wetland protections. The oral arguments came just months after the court’s 6-3 conservative majority limited executive authority to address climate change in a case involving federal regulation of greenhouse gases. The clean water case, brought by an Idaho couple seeking to build a house on a plot of land they bought near Priest Lake in the state’s panhandle, provides an opportunity for the court to rein in what types of waters are subject to a provision of the Clean Water Act known as “Waters of the United States.”
Supreme Court sides with Sacketts
Unanimous decision allows PL couple their day in court.
WASHINGTON, DC — In a historic and unprecedented decision, the U.S. Supreme Court has sided with a Priest Lake couple in a property rights case, ruling that they have the right to go court and challenge an Environmental Protection Agency order that blocked construction of their new home and threatened draconian fines of as much as $75,000 a day.